Strategies
The following strategic approaches have been established
for
each of the defined goals of the Regional Plan of Action.
1. Strengthening regional surveillance networks for infectious
diseases in the Americas
Several surveillance networks are presently functioning in the Americas. Some of these networks, such as those for polio and measles, were established as part of eradication programs. Their role has been very valuable in documenting the elimination of these diseases. The cholera network was established after the re-emergence of this disease in the Americas and provides useful information on its distribution in the Region. The WHONET was developed by the World Health Organization for use in laboratories to monitor antimicrobial resistance and guide the selection of antibiotics, and to identify resistance and quality control problems, at both national and international levels. The influenza and dengue networks and the WHO Collaborating Centers are examples of other networks making significant contributions to the surveillance of infectious diseases in the Americas. In addition, the Caribbean Epidemiology Center (CAREC), the Pan American Foot-and-Mouth Disease Center (PANAFTOSA), and the Pan American Institute for Food Protection and Zoonoses (INPPAZ) have important functions in the surveillance of human and animal diseases. It should also be noted that the Integrated Border Information and Surveillance System (IBISS) for monitoring health events in the United States-Mexico border region is currently under development.
Regional leadership and coordination are necessary to enhance these existing capacities by strengthening and linking established laboratories and surveillance facilities. Advantage should be taken of modern technologies in information management, exchange, and dissemination, such as geographic information systems (GIS), the Public Health Laboratory Information System (PHLIS), and the Internet and World Wide Web (WWW) connections.
Consideration should be given to establishing a regional committee for emerging infectious disease surveillance to develop priorities and enhance regional surveillance, in close coordination with the countries of the Region. The committee could include representatives of leading institutions in these countries.
The purpose of the surveillance should be to detect, promptly investigate, and monitor emerging pathogens, the diseases they cause, and the factors influencing their emergence. In this context, three lines of surveillance should be considered:
- Micropathogen surveillance. This approach would rely on laboratory-based surveillance and should utilize techniques for isolation or culture of etiological agents, serological testing, and monitoring of antimicrobial resistance.
- Syndrome surveillance. The system would use existing capacities for routine and sentinel surveillance, including public and private hospitals and health clinics. The syndromes to monitor would include respiratory failure of unknown etiology, encephalitis and aseptic meningitis, hemorrhagic fevers (febrile illness with thrombocytopenia), febrile illness with rash, acute flaccid paralysis, dysentery/ acute febrile diarrhea with blood and or mucus, and unexplained jaundice.
- Surveillance of selected specific factors known to be associated with an emerging infectious disease, such as environmental changes and food handling practices.
2. Establishing national and regional infrastructures for early warning of and rapid response to emerging infectious disease threats through laboratory enhancement and multidisciplinary training programs
To establish the appropriate infrastructure to respond to a new disease threat, human resources, facilities for laboratory capacities and clinical training, communica-tions, logistical support, and organizational structure must be developed.
Appropriately trained personnel will be a critical component of the infrastructure needed for early warning and rapid response. Training programs should be carried out in partnership with the numerous national institutions that provide such training in the Americas. Particularly important will be the development of education and training activities targeted at practical issues of disease surveillance, recognition, and response. These activities should focus on the country-level medical community to facilitate appropriate specimen collection and handling, the laboratory resources for optimum specimen processing, and the intelligent utilization of data obtained by program managers. Training should also target country-level laboratory personnel. Collaborative programs with organizations in the United States of America and other countries are needed to train specialists in state-of-the-art, field-applicable, and cost-effective technologies.
Career development is essential. There must be a system for training skilled personnel for each of these roles and a career path to ensure retention. This is especially true for surveillance (both laboratory and epidemiologic), where there is often no developed career path and no career incentive. At both regional and national levels, contacts and partnerships with appropriate professional groups (and the development of appropriate groups, when none exist) should be encouraged.
It is necessary to define the complement of minimal laboratory (and epidemiologic) capabilities that should be available at each level (from the local, through national, to subregional and regional), develop guidelines and standard procedures, and assist governments in implementing these guidelines. There is also a need for a comprehensive survey of suitable laboratory and epidemiological facilities and for an assessment of their capabilities. This should be done through questionnaires and (as necessary) visits. As a start, all known laboratory networks
should be listed and assessed. Regional quality assurance and
quality control programs for diagnostic laboratories need to be
implemented. Guidelines should be available for sample collection, handling, and storage. Regional self-sufficiency in diagnostics is a goal, with the more specialized reagents produced, at least
initially, by appropriate specialized laboratories; the reagents would then be standardized and inventoried regionally. Technology
transfer of laboratory diagnostic tests should be encouraged, including appropriate
ways to evaluate and utilize tests that might
be of particular value in the Region.
Different communication mechanisms
are appropriate at
different levels, with fax and electronic communications being the
major options beyond the local level. Implementing a small number
of well-standardized and well-established systems, such as PHLIS
(with EPI-INFO) and WHONET (for antimicrobial resistance data),
would facilitate data sharing and coordination.
Logistical support must be assured at regional level for the
provision of diagnostic reagents, supplies, and equipment. At
national level, systems must exist for specimen collection and
transport from original sites to laboratories.
3. Promoting the further development of applied research in the
areas of rapid diagnosis, epidemiology and prevention
Under the category of applied research are included
diagnostics, treatment, prevention, surveillance, development of
products, and studies of socioeconomic factors affecting disease transmission.
Each country must determine its own emerging disease priority list. Obviously, the applied research needs will vary, depending
on the diseases selected. In many countries, basic epidemiologic
information about emerging diseases is still lacking. Research is
needed on the prevalence, morbidity/mortality, geographic
distribution, risk factors, and presence or absence of appropriate
vectors and/or reservoirs, among others.
It is essential to standardize the clinical diagnosis and treatment of newly emerging diseases, and diagnostic protocols should be developed for the major emerging disease groups. Research is needed on the pathogenesis and spectrum of disease caused by emerging agents. This should include acute as well as chronic disease manifestations.
Development of rapid and simple diagnostic techniques for emerging pathogens should have high priority. It would be useful to develop reagents (e.g., recombinant antigens and well-characterized monoclonal antibodies) which could be produced by a
regional reference center or by local laboratories, depending on
their capabilities.
There should be more field application of molecular epidemiologic techniques. On the other hand, some molecular techniques are not within the capability or budget of every
laboratory. Studies of the cost effectiveness of various diagnostic tests should be carried out. There is often a tendency
to develop the newest high-tech (molecular) diagnostic test when it may be more cost-effective to continue using a simpler and older test which gives the same information.
Antimicrobial resistance is a growing
worldwide problem and a subject urgently needing research. Studies in this area should
include the control of antibiotics in animal feed and fish/shrimp
farms, testing of new drugs, and evaluation of therapies. Antimicrobial resistance should be studied in health care settings and in the community. It is important that the resulting
information be disseminated from researchers to users in the community.
Food- and waterborne diseases are another important area for
research. This should include studies of the economic, social, and
behavioral factors affecting disease transmission.
Partnerships should be encouraged between investigators in different countries in developing applied research programs. In an era of reduced funding, sharing of resources and knowledge makes good sense.
Development of vaccines and other preventive strategies should have high priority in applied research programs. There should also be periodic evaluation of the cost- effectiveness of different preventive and control measures.
More research is needed on the effects of social, behavioral, and ecologic factors/changes on disease emergence. Research in this area should include the development and testing of innovative interventions to control or prevent emerging diseases.
In many countries, vector control programs now have low priority and are not very effective Research is needed on
alternative vector control strategies. This should include
research on social and behavioral risk factors associated with
disease risk prevention. There is a growing need for field-trained
entomologists to study vector biology and behavior under field
conditions.
4.Strengthening the regional capacity for effective
implementation of prevention and control strategies
Consideration should be given to three broad areas related to
prevention and control strategies for emerging diseases in the
Americas:
- Information Dissemination:
This would consist of developing and regularly updating disease-specific prevention and control
guidelines for communities and individuals, addressing both biologic and behavioral
measures. Their development would require groups of experts for each disease as well as communications
experts. Diseases of interest include, but are not limited to, yellow fever, dengue, antimicrobial resistant organisms (P. falciparum, M. tuberculosis and enteric bacteria), measles, polio,
cholera and other food- and waterborne diseases, viral hemorrhagic
fevers, plague, rabies and other zoonoses, trypanosomiasis and other vectorborne diseases. Points of contact to receive and transmit information in countries where action is taken should be
properly identified, including organizations and individuals
outside the government sector. In addition, in order to involve communities in the fight against emerging diseases, plans must be
developed to distribute accurate and timely information for the
education of the general public and the health community, making effective use of the press, including radio, television,
newspapers, flyers, and other media.
- Antimicrobial resistance:
It is desirable to seek ways to reduce easy availability of over-the-counter antimicrobial agents,
including veterinary applications. This would require efforts
beyond the health care community, involving high-level interaction,
education, and information dissemination to all sectors.
Assistance to the countries in developing rational drug policies
should be intensified. A very important aspect entails monitoring
sensitivities to antibiotics in each country to allow for optimum
selection of effective antibiotic use for individual cases and to
eliminate antibiotics with little therapeutic value. Advantage
should be taken of software presently available, such as WHONET and PHLIS. Other points to be considered include frequent revision and
distribution of lists of essential antimicrobials based on
sensitivity data and launching educational campaigns on cost-effectiveness of rational drug use in hospitals. Collaboration
should be maintained with the pharmaceutical industry on rational
drug use and on standardized labels and warnings, and ethical
marketing strategies should be encouraged.
- Outbreak evaluation and control:
Several actions should be implemented in order to deal properly with epidemics. For example, for contingency situations it is necessary to develop or update
guidelines that include: (i) timely recommenda-tions to coordinate
response to outbreaks or threats, including issues related to travel advisories, quarantine, and commerce; (ii) policies and
standard operating plans for response to outbreaks, at the regional and country levels; and (iii) lists of individuals and groups with
disease-specific expertise, laboratories with disease-specific
diagnostic capabilities, and products, such as diagnostic reagents,
drugs, and vaccines (both licensed and investigational products). Most importantly, a system for rapid procurement of vaccines, reagents, insecticides and antimicrobials for prompt response to
outbreaks should be available. Information management and
dissemination procedures should be in place for use during
outbreaks, including accurate and regular release of information to
the press and public.
Return to top
Bibliography
- Casellas JM, Guzman Blanco M, Pinto ME. The Sleeping Giant, Antimicrobial Resistance. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America. Vol. 8(1): 29-45. March 1994.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Addressing Emerging Infectious Diseases Threats: A Prevention Strategy for the United States. 1994.
- Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press. Emerging Infectious Diseases: Microbial Threats to Health in the United States of America. Lederberg S, Shope RE, Oak SC (eds.). Washington, D.C., 1992.
- Pan American Health Organization. Health Conditions in the Americas. Scientific Publication No. 549. 1994.
- Pan American Health Organization. Re-emerging of Bolivian Hemorrhagic fever. Epidemiol Bull., Vol. 15(4): 4-5. 1994.
- Pan American Health Organization. Regional Plan of Action for Combating New, Re-emerging, and Emerging Infectious Diseases. (In
preparation).
- Proceedings and Recommendations of the Expert Working Group on Emerging Infectious Diseases. Communicable Disease Report, ISSN, 1188-4169, Volume 20S2. Canada, December 1994.
- World Health Organization.
Executive Board, Ninety-fifth Session, Communicable Disease Prevention and Control. New, Emerging, and
Re-emerging Infectious Diseases. Report by the Director-General. Document EB95/61, 12 January 1995.
- World Health Organization. Report of the Second WHO Meeting on
Emerging Infectious Diseases. Document WHO/CDS/BVI/95.2. Geneva,12-13 January 1995.
Source: Division of Disease Prevention and Control, Communicable diseases Program, HCP/HCT, PAHO.
Return to top
Return to issue index
Index of Online Bulletins