Volume 6 No. 2 - 2002 |
|||||
![]() By Daniel Epstein |
|||||
Smallpox Nightmare The ultimate nightmare of some health experts is a terrorist release of smallpox, a scourge that killed 3 million to 4 million people every year before it was eradicated more than two decades ago. If released in an international airport, for instance, the virus could infect people who would not show symptoms for days. Because the virus spreads through face-to-face contact, they in turn could infect many more people worldwide, initiating a full-blown outbreak of smallpox that would become an international health emergency.
The eradication of smallpox in 1980, culminating a 12-year global effort led by the World Health Organization (WHO), is widely considered one of humanity's greatest achievements, marking the first time a disease was wiped off the face of the earth. But no one is certain who still has the deadly virus, apart from the two declared stocks in the United States and Russia. Former Soviet scientists say Russia continued biological weapons research after smallpox was eradicated, producing the virus at least into the 1990s. Some officials fear that scientists who worked on that effort might have sold the virus to terrorists or rogue nations.
How realistic is the smallpox threat? No one really knows. But Dr. D.A. Henderson, the physician who led the global smallpox eradication effort from 1966 to 1977, was concerned enough that he began warning about just such a threat in the early 1990s. A former dean of the Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health and currently an adviser to PAHO, Dr. Henderson founded and directed the Johns Hopkins Center for Civilian Biodefense Studies to carry out research on bioterrorism. On Nov. 1, seven weeks and two days after the events of Sept. 11, Dr. Henderson was named to head a new Office of Public Health Preparedness for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. One of a select and tight-knit group of doctors who worked to rid the world of smallpox, Dr. Henderson says that more than anything, he would like to persuade the countries of the world to come together to condemn the use of germs as weapons. "We've got to put the genie back in the bottle," he told The New York Times in November. The eradication program was an international effort, he points out, and other nations wanted the virus destroyed. "We had countries around the world saying, 'Why are Big Brother United States and Big Brother Russia keeping the virus?'" Clearly, there was a danger that the virus could escape, as it did in a laboratory in England in 1978, infecting a medical photographer. Moreover, he adds, by destroying its stocks, the United States could make possession of it a crime. Dr. David Heymann, who worked in the smallpox eradication effort under Dr. Henderson and is now executive director for communicable diseases at WHO in Geneva, notes that in the event of a terrorist attack with smallpox, "the industrialized countries are, and will be, much better equipped to contain it than are developing countries." He adds, "It's not clear that we could muster up any will to do another eradication program. I think it would be hard to sell because if you do eradicate it again, you're in the same vulnerable situation we are in now."
Terrorism experts generally agree that the risk of using a weapon that could kill their own people would not deter some radical groups, especially those that are motivated by religious fervor. Mr. Michael Swetnam, chairman of the Potomac Institute for Policy Studies in Arlington, Va., says the possibility of a smallpox attack should be taken seriously. But he adds that other weapons, such as a conventional bomb, a chemical agent, or a different type of biological agent, are more likely to be used for the simple reason that smallpox is hard to get. Still, exaggerating the risk of a smallpox attack might not be a bad thing, Mr. Swetnam says. "If we blow it out of proportion and we make sure we stockpile enough vaccine for everybody, then there's no incentive for them to use it. It will cost us a lot of money, but it's buying insurance." >>>> Continue [Threats Bring Change]
|